Dilemma

They are off on their holidays. We are left with the double excitement of whether England will win the World cup and whether BBC or ITV will win the favours of WAG CB.  I cheer for England in the former and ITV in the latter.

Is it the case that England’s poor showing is caused by its players being over paid and generally not very bright, even thick. Importantly, could this explain why CB is now a WAG. It cannot be denied that her attachment to FL has enhanced her career. But then everyone has a right to earn a living as best they can. CB has limited choices.

An Improvement?

 

 

Over the last few weeks I have started to enjoy the feature items. They have improved in subject, content and style.

On the other hand, the two presenters are often silly and patronising. This irritates me.

Michael Flatley last night came across as supercilious. His mawkish speech about family and fatherhood would go down well with American audiences; but it does not work here. If this incident was staged then the editor should be taken out and shot then the crew will really have something to cry about.

We are told the CB intends to stay with the BBC. Importantly, the BBC will not pay her the inflated fee that  ITV had allegedly promised. Never the less she is wise to stay. If CB is prepared to work hard, which frankly I doubt, then the BBC will lick her into shape. The BBC has much that it can teach her [not least how to read an autocue] .CB is well shot of the malign influence of Adrian Chiles, whose motives towards her are suspect.

 

The Face Of 2012 - yeah right